![]() ![]() In this chapter, we introduce key rhetorical concepts and terms we will use throughout this text while engaging you with an exploration of the multiple identities and personal elements you bring to your academic literacies.īy engaging in and reflecting upon the content, processes, and assignments in this textbook, you will begin to develop an identity as an academic “insider” and a competent college writer, reader, and researcher. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.Chapter 1 College Writing, Rhetoric, and YouĬhapter 1 introduces the purpose of first year composition courses in your academic, career, and lifelong learning contexts. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.įor librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. View the institutional accounts that are providing access.View your signed in personal account and access account management features.Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.Ĭlick the account icon in the top right to: See below.Ī personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions. Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account. When on the society site, please use the credentials provided by that society.If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal: Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways: If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian. If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.Įnter your library card number to sign in. Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic.When on the institution site, please use the credentials provided by your institution.Select your institution from the list provided, which will take you to your institution's website to sign in.Click Sign in through your institution.Shibboleth / Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic. ![]() This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.Ĭhoose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways: Get help with access Institutional accessĪccess to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. Further, it is shown in this chapter that emotional manipulation in Cicero is not as problematical as it initially appears. Cicero accommodates emotional appeals to circumstance based on his belief in decorum as a moral principle. It is suggested that Cicero’s approach to the rhetorical emotions is more acceptable to a modern audience than Aristotle’s because it is ethically based while also responsive to political realities. Moreover, Aristotle’s approach to emotional appeals in politics is static, unable to adapt to new political circumstances when compared to Cicero’s approach. It is argued in this chapter that, by grounding his account of emotional appeals in the art of rhetoric, Aristotle does not evade the moral problems originating in emotional manipulation. Although it is widely accepted that Aristotle forges a better relationship among rhetoric, the emotions, and political morality than Cicero, this chapter contends that Cicero, not Aristotle, offers a more relevant account of the relationship among these terms.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |